« Utah Senator Defends Ban on Keyword Advertising in Blogoshpere (Update) | Main | Do IM Sessions and Email Exchanges Constitute Virtual Meetings for Purposes of Open Meeting Laws? »

Advertisers Wasatch Out - Utah Passes Anti-Adword Law

Utah.bmpThe use of trademark keyword advertising seems to have reached a pretty decent equilibrium in the online marketing world.  Sure, many advertisers piggyback off of the interest associated with other marks, but sponsored link adwords have evolved into a genuine tool with little likelihood of confusing consumers as to origin.   Google has been vindicated a number of times in the past on this practice. 

That equilibrium could be upset by the Trademark Protection Act recently passed by the Utah Senate and enacted into law.  The law allows owners of trademarks and, potentially, domain names to register a mark and have a cause of action if that mark is used to trigger an advertisement of another business, good or service.   Given the reach of the Internet, the bill certainly faces the possibility that a court could declare it unconstitutional on dormant commerce clause grounds.  Until then, the law further clouds the picture for key word advertisers.  And, as Professor Eric Goldman points out in his blog, recent validations of the scope of Section 230 preemption could serve to protect Google and other online intermediaries.  This could again leave advertisers with most of the risk.

Posted on Friday, April 6, 2007 at 01:05PM by Registered CommenterSteve Cosentino in | Comments2 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (2)

Thanks Steve, for the thoughtful post. Utah is a business-friendly state as well as highly tech-savvy(more computers per capita than anywhere else). We wanted to protect the value of trademarks held by Utah companies. The new law should only cause problems for those who want to carjack someone else's trademark investment.
April 6, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterThe Senate Site
This law will ruin the Internet for Utahans. When I go to a hotel concierge and ask, "Where's the closest P.F. Chang's?" He'll probably say, "Well, it's right on A street (Search Results), but there is a far-better little Chinese restaurant I like over on B street (Sponsored Result)."

Is Utah going to legislate all of its concierge desks into illegality, as well?

Google is nothing more than an online concierge that we visit when we are wanting to find something. They gladly do the service of pointing us in the right direction, but they also offer some additional advice on the side, literally. True, they get their kick-backs on the side, but hey, you, the consumer, make the final decision of whether to accept their advice.

Only difference, Google (and search engines) are kind enough to clearly label their "side advice" as "sponsored results."

The government has no right telling google or your supermarket what to display on store shelves. When a consumer walks into google and asks to be pointed to a certain brand of cough syrup, google has every right to stock the neighboring shelves with competitors' products. In the end, the consumer picks-up/clicks on the product of its own choosing!!! Utah lawmakers passed a bad law, on the bad advice of bad men looking to score a bad-ass contract!
April 12, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMe Utah Resident Evil

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.